Law Articles
To search for a particular term please use the following search box.
Law Topics
Click on a Topic to see available articles for that topic.
- Accidents
- Administrative Law
- Admiralty Law
- Articles
- Banking
- Bankruptcy Law
- Canon Law
- Case Law
- Civil Law
- Civil Rights
- Class Action Lawsuits
- Commercial Law
- Common Law
- Comparative Law
- Constitutional Law
- Consumer Law
- Contracts
- Corporate Law
- Courts
- Criminal Law
- Cyber Law
- Dispute Resolution
- Employment Law
- Equity
- Evidence
- Family Law
- Fiduciary Law
- General Practice
- Government
- Health Law
- Immigration Law
- Insurance Law
- Intellectual Property
- International Law
- Jurisprudence
- Labor Law
- Law and Economics
- Maritime Law
- Military Law
- Natural Law
- Personal Injury Law
- Philosophy of Law
- Property Law
- Public Law
- Real Estate Law
- Social Security
- Space Law
- Statutory Law
- Tax Law
- Traffic Law
- Trusts and Estates
- Water Law
Return to Law Dictionary Index
Creator and Four Users of Loverspy Spyware Program Indicted
United States Attorney Carol C. Lam of the Southern District of California and John C. Richter, Acting Assistant Attorney General for the Criminal Division, U.S. Department of Justice, announced today the indictments of Carlos Enrique Perez-Melara � the creator and marketer of a spyware program called �Loverspy� - and four others who used Loverspy illegally to break into the computers and illegally intercept the electronic communications of others.
The indictment charges Mr. Perez with: creating a surreptitious interception device, (i.e., the Loverspy program); sending the program, concealed in an innocuous-appearing electronic greeting card, to victims; advertising the program; advertising the surreptitious use of the program; illegal wiretapping; disclosing illegally intercepted communications; and obtaining unauthorized access to the victim computers. Each count of the 35-count indictment carries a maximum penalty of five years in prison and a maximum fine of $250,000 per count.
In addition to the indictment of Mr. Perez, the federal grand jury sitting in San Diego handed up separate, two-count indictments charging John J. Gannitto of Laguna Beach, CA; Kevin B. Powell of Long Beach, CA; Laura Selway of Irvine, CA; and, Cheryl Ann Young of Ashland, PA., with illegal computer hacking, through utilization of Loverspy, in furtherance of other criminal activity and with illegally intercepting the electronic communications of their victims. Each of the two counts carries a maximum penalty of up to five years in prison and a maximum fine of up to $250,000.
�This federal indictment � one of the first in the country to target a manufacturer of �spyware� computer software � is particularly important because of the damage done to people�s privacy by these insidious programs,� said Acting Assistant Attorney General John C. Richter of the Criminal Division. �Programs such as Loverspy exist solely to latch onto computer equipment for the purpose of stealing personal and financial information. Law enforcement must continue to take action against the manufacturers of these programs to protect unsuspecting victims and seek punishment for those responsible for wreaking havoc online.�
United States Attorney Carol C. Lam said, �What the promoters of Loverspy didn�t know was that while they were watching their victims, law enforcement was watching them.�
Daniel R. Dzwilewski, Special Agent in Charge of the San Diego Office of the Federal Bureau of Investigation, stated: �The Internet must remain a safe place for all to enjoy without fear of identity theft and/or loss of privacy and, therefore, the FBI will continue to aggressively pursue those who compromise the privacy of innocent victims through the utilization of �Spyware�.�
Other Loverspy purchasers have been prosecuted by federal authorities in Charlotte, NC; Dallas, TX; and, Honolulu, HI and are being prosecuted in Kansas City, MO and Houston, TX. U.S. Attorney Lam expressed her appreciation for the continuing support and assistance of the Computer Crime and Intellectual Property Section of the U. S. Department of Justice. A concerted effort to identify, investigate and prosecute Loverspy purchasers is being conducted by the United States Attorney�s Office and Federal Bureau of Investigation in San Diego. This case was investigated by Special Agents of the San Diego Division of the Federal Bureau of Investigation. The Loverspy operation was dismantled by the execution of a federal search warrant upon Perez�s residence by the FBI on October 10, 2003. All known Loverspy victims have been notified by electronic mail that the program was launched against them.
DEFENDANTS
Carlos Enrique Perez-Melara Location Unknown Case Number: 05CR1264LAB
John J. Gannitto Case Number: 05CR1486LAB
Kevin B. Powell Case Number: 05CR1487LAB
Laura F. Selway
aka Laura Shay Selway Case Number: 05CR1488LAB
Cheryl Ann Young Case Number: 05CR1485LAB
SUMMARY OF CHARGES Charges
Against Mr. Perez:
Count 1: Manufacturing a Surreptitious Interception Device 3
Title 18, United States Code, Section 2512(1)(b)
Count 2: Sending a Surreptitious Interception Device
Title 18, United States Code, Section 2512(1)(a)
Count 3: Advertising a Surreptitious Interception Device
Title 18, United States Code, Section 2512(1)(c)(i)
Count 4: Advertising the Surreptitious Use of an Interception Device
Title 18, United States Code, Section 2512(1)(c)(ii)
Counts 5-14: Unlawfully Intercepting Electronic Communications
Title 18, United States Code, Section 2511(1)(a)
Counts 15-24: Disclosing Unlawfully Intercepted Electronic Communications
Title 18, United States Code, Section 2511(1)(c)
Counts 25-35: Unauthorized Access to Protected Computers for Financial Gain
Title 18, United States Code, Sections1030(a)(2)(C) and (c)(2)(B)(I)
Each of the two counts carries a maximum penalty of up to five years in prison and a maximum fine of up to $250,000.
INVESTIGATING AGENCY
Federal Bureau of Investigation
An indictment itself is not evidence that the defendants committed the crimes charged. The defendants are presumed innocent until the Government meets its burden in court of proving guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.
Read the complete article at cybercrime.gov